Defend competition in a market means ensuring that all operators that participate in it do so on equal terms. It can hardly be construed that regulation of conditions of access to a market is incompatible with freedom if what you intended is exactly that those who offer ir home to tourists what to do in same conditions as ors. The so-called-story tourist violate essential requirements of this equality. In first place, because y compete with accommodations, hospitality and housing prepared for this purpose in conditions of unfair advantage. The phenomenon of flats tourism has fragmented market into two large groups: first is subject to granting of licenses, controls, and fiscal discipline; second, story tour, operated without any limit and regardless of any surveillance tax.
For se general reasons, challenge that has made National Commission of Markets and Competition (CNMC) of local regulations in Madrid, Bilbao and San Sebastian for regular floors tourist requires a detailed explanation of agency's challenger. To say that regulations are appealed (administrative) “violate competition” because “”prevent entry of new operators in market,” hardly explains anything. Are in general respectable, but insufficient. Clarify to Commission what specific aspects in breach of rules local rule of competition. Because entry of “new operators” is only healthy if it occurs in same conditions that “old” ones; microwave-transmitted reports administrative and tax leads to social dumping.Editorial previous
social Rental properties (27/07/2018)
To recover rent (27/06/2018)
Tenants evicted (20/04/2018)
it Is equally arguable that emergence of se new operators will contribute to lower rental prices, wher cheap or not; in fact re is strong evidence to contrary. On or hand, Municipalities have right to know of all those who devote mselves to accommodate tourists —is an economic activity— and to preserve quality of urban environment, in accordance with laws and following claims for those of neighbours, whose quality of life is proliferation of housing tourist spot is contributing to degrade. Madrid, Bilbao, San Sebastian, Barcelona, and Valencia understand it as well and react accordingly. There is No phobia to tourism or profit-interventionist time-barred; it's just to put order where re is none.
which leaves in evidence conflict between municipalities and regulator is low capacity of negotiation of parties. If some specific aspects of rules-challenged — limitation of types of housing, perhaps— are contrary to competition, corríjanse in good time and with agreement between parties. If commission requested explanations on basics of rules appealed, y had to be in ir day, to not end up in a confrontation that will harm tourists, neighbors and market of horeca. And if challenges are of detail, which are not invoked only general principles of competition. This is a particular problem with concrete effects.
you Can follow THE COUNTRY's Opinion on Facebook, Twitter or subscribe here to Newsletter.Share on Facebook Share on Twitter OtrosCerrarCompartir in LinkedinCompartir in GooglePlusCompartir on Pinterest
To conquer the market of cyber security
More protection against unemployment
The EU more human
The great capitals of Europe and the U.S. also...
Does the coffee? It already pays for my mobile
Trump punishes Iran
The secesionismo decides
Jeroen Merchiers: Airbnb ist nicht das Problem
Nasa: Start der Parker-Sonde verschoben
Flüchtlinge in Bayern: Von einem Koch, der nicht...
Joe Kaeser: Siemens-Chef sieht Rassismus als...
Währungskrise in der Türkei: Es reicht der...