Oprah Winfrey: Billionaires as Savior

The more politics in the United States loses prestige, the more hope lies with non-politicians: Should the talk show presenter Oprah Winfrey compete against Trump?

Oprah Winfrey: Billionaires as Savior
Content
  • Page 1 — Billionaires as Saviors
  • Page 2 — Free Publicity ultimately helps president
  • Read on a page

    75 times Hollywood Foreign Press Association has already awarded Griffin praises. But fact that only wegeneiner speech about a presidential candidacy spekuliertwird, that should be unique. But re's just one Oprah Winfrey.

    No question, Oprah Winfrey's speech had it in itself. She was precise, passionate, inspiring, historical. A distant echo of a former president, Desmoke once spoke so. And in a situation where White House only onomatopoeia nonsense over big buttons and "Schussel-Steve", Oprah's speech zwangsläufigvergleichsweise presidential sounded. No wonder that before Beverly Hilton hotel's applause was away, social networks were debating Winfrey's political ambitions.

    Oprah Winfrey is a lifestyle guru, talk show presenter, actress, cultural entity, yes institution – why Alsonicht also president? She is, confirmed Demoskopensogleich, very popular, much more popular than man she would 2020herausfordern. She has a uramerikanischeAufstiegsgeschichte, while he sells only one potemkinscheVersion of American Dream. He sells alpha, you empathy. He claims to take people's worries seriously, she has been earning money for decades. Granted, Winfrey has also sold all sorts of nonsense to her talk show – vaccination skepticism, comical investment vehicles and, if you will, Jonathan Franzen. But Verglichenmit Trump vodka and permanent company bankruptcies of incumbent officeisof comparatively tame.

    The fact that y have never bekleidethat a political office, so many Democrats might think, is likely to be more zumVorteil. Because what did Hillary Clinton bring that sieeindeutig better know about government business, y was clearly better prepared than her opponent? Perhaps it would be better if 2020 a rhetorical brillanteMedienpersönlichkeit like Winfrey, unencumbered by genaunachlesbaren political positions, withdraw race. At end HätteTrump, following an almost dialectical logic, made a PräsidentinWinfrey possible.

    USA-Donald Trump sees Oprah Winfrey on candidacy superior US President Donald Trump has commented on speculation about a presidential candidacy of US television presenter Oprah Winfrey. He could defeat Winfrey, but he did not believe that she 2020 running, he said. © PHOTO: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst Times quickly a tweet about neoliberalism

    It is a good question how serious debate was. Those who found this idea great was Winfrey's unsurpassed antipodes to Donald Trump: eloquent, blacksmith of her own happiness, a fervent anti-racist undFrauenrechtlerin – why not at least rhetorically against denMillionenerben, racists And sexiest Trump in field? Fürdiejenigen, who in Trump was a symptom of a looming Oligarchiesehen, idea of two rich celebs arguing substantiate presidency was simply too perfect not to let Nochschnell a tweet about neoliberalism.

    From Winfrey's actual message about Denlangen shadow of racism and sexism, over power and Hoffnungim age of MeToo, it seems to have distracted. A Zynikerkönnte smooth claim that it is done consciously: instead of dealing with DerSubstanz of Winfrey's speech, one misplaces sichlieber on anemic political sportsbook, which are too often confused with journalism in USAviel. The unbequemenTatsache that Winfrey touches real wounds differs from Indemman about power politics oracles.

    On or hand, Winfrey is not ErsteMegareiche, interest in a political career nahegelegtwird. The notion that billionaire in White House can only be challenged assisted or billionaire that Wundenur closes spear that struck m, that has a mythologischeSchlüssigkeit. For dialectical materialist, a democratic Milliardärspräsident would establish transition to oligarchy, Trumps cabinet, so to speak as a new rule and not Alsgefährliche exception.

    This is why every Gestevon Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos and Mark Cuban, which is still so meaningless, is counted as an indication for forthcoming presidential candidacy. Also TomSteyer, hedge fund billionaire, who in a big way supports anti-Trump agenda and who, in particular, trumps Amtsenbungagitiert, are being conpresidentialed with ambitions. The more DiePolitik loses its reputation, closer it is to einenNichtpolitiker race, wher it's EinenFinanzmann like Steyer or a celebrity like Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson. And more two political parties lose DieKontrolle about nomination process, Realistischerwird idea.

    Date Of Update: 11 January 2018, 12:03
    NEXT NEWS