The defamation lawsuit between Amber Heard and Johnny Depp in the United States and its television broadcast will have a "potentially catastrophic" impact for victims of domestic violence, say women's advocacy organizations.
• Read also: Standing ovation for Johnny Depp in England
• Read also: Johnny Depp's victory
• Read also: Amber Heard is not a “perfect victim”
The six weeks of proceedings in the court of Fairfax, near Washington, have turned into a great unpacking on the private life of the couple of Hollywood stars who accused each other of violence.
Jurors ruled in favor of the “Pirate of the Caribbean” on Wednesday and awarded him just over $10 million in damages, ruling that the 36-year-old actress had defamed her ex-husband by presenting himself as “a personality representing domestic violence” in a column published in 2018, even if Johnny Depp was not mentioned.
Judge Penney Azcarate had decided to allow the hearings to be broadcast on television for this ultra-high-profile case, despite the opposition of Amber Heard's lawyers.
For Michele Dauber, a law professor at Stanford University and an activist against sexual assault on campus, it is “the worst decision made by a court in decades for victims” which shows “a deep misunderstanding of sexual violence from the judge".
According to her, Amber Heard had to “describe her alleged rape in raw detail on television. It is shocking and it should offend all women and victims, whether they agree with the verdict or not.”
The last time a rape victim was forced to testify publicly was in 1983, she said.
"There is no public interest in this case that could possibly outweigh the harm caused," said Michelle Dauber, saying that now "every victim will think twice before coming forward and asking for a restraining order. or tell anyone about the abuse she suffered.
“Women can be hurt, even killed, because they don't call for help. This case was a complete disaster. It is potentially catastrophic,” she concludes.
The trial has fascinated a global audience unaccustomed to watching allegations of marital sexual assault and that -- regardless of opinions on the verdict -- is a problem, also warns Ruth Glenn, president of the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence (NCADV).
"I don't think our society yet understands the dynamics of domestic violence," she told AFP.
This crucial context was not sufficiently discussed during the court proceedings, she believes, saying that for her there is “no doubt” about the types of abuse that were revealed at trial.
“You have to make sure that the people present understand that. But as long as we don't do that, don't show this stuff on TV,” she warns.
The insulting messages received by Michele Dauber for commenting on the lawsuit on Twitter also illustrate, according to her, the growing opposition to women's rights in the United States, in the context of threats to the right to abortion by the Court supreme.
Public opinion supported Johnny Depp while his accuser was the subject of “openly misogynistic” insults and jeers on social networks, she believes.
Amber Heard suffered "metaphorically the ordeal of tar and feathers", says Michele Dauber, while the judgment was hailed by the American right.
The case also raises the question of the future of the movement
“It is impossible not to see this as a backlash for
But Tarana Burke, founder of
Ruth Glenn wants to see in the lawsuit a “reminder of the work that we still have to do”. “It’s a perfect example of a case influencing a culture,” she explains.
SOS conjugal violence