DieZEIT is certainly unsuspicious to serve liars and false victims sais: There were time searches (time No. 19/2002), because of which two innocents, who had been sent to prison by a misjudgment as supposed Vergewaltigerfür for many years, After EinerWiederaufnahme were acquitted and compensated in full (SZ/4 January 2018).
Ltwas time that has been used in Tiler process – from outset – for falsely accused wear moderator, auchhier solely on basis of extensive research (time No. 26/2010). And more than any or, this newspaper has addressed VerhängnisvolleAnziehungskraft, which exercises role of angeblichenVerbrechensopfers on Wichtigtuerinnen and unstable minds. (Time No. 15/2008, time No. 46/2013, time No. 27/2016).
Dasfürchteten those women who have attacked and sexually coerced Time magazine of past Wocheberichteten, such as Star Director Dieter Wedel, before Jahrenkörperlich. Theyhave is subjected to weeks of intensive interviews and research by two time reporters, disclosed intimate records discharged to her psychorapist by secrecy. And siewussten that time would not allow itself to be put to present, but would also – from ir information independent – conduct research: uninvolved third parties, colleagues and companions, who had received dieunmittelbaren consequences of attacks in a timely manner, Wurdeneinvernommen (ZEITmagazinNr. 2/2018). And two of witnesses made ir statements public under ir real-life, so y took risk of being attacked in front of m and being put down as implausible.
Of course, no one was involved in attacks y describe. Not even time. Here Deficitas statement of several women against those of Dieter Wedel, who did not want to speak with time, but accusations in writing dementierthat. However, prosecutors and judges face this problem every day. Why should time evade him? Should evidence have been reason to waive publication of accusations?
What women tell are not triviaWirhaben, especially in view of hysterical traits, parti metoo debate sometimes assumes – a movement by way, in time itself (and among authors) is quite controversially discussed. And we know very well what problem is a "statement-against-statement" constellation. That is also why we have made it difficult for us: we have taken action VonErmittlern to example and n result Vonmehr than two months of research and almost fifty Befragungengewürdigt. Then we had to keep Tatgeschehen Fürhochwahrscheinlich. Therefore, we report.
WASD women tell are no trivia, no open Hosenladenim schummer light, no hand on knee to advanced Stundeoder Gelallte compliments about alleged superwidths. Geschildertwerden highly aggressive sexual attacks, which police UndStaatsanwaltschaft had also called on plan at that time, Wärensie became known in 1990s.
The two witnesses Jany temple and Patricia Thielemann 1996 und1991 not police, have now criticized m and time: Example writes former court reporter GiselaFriedrichsen in world, now be a "moral standing court" Opened and "one of most distinguished and successful film and TV directors" Andean Media pillory ". It would have been better to ask wher "allegations are criminal (yet)". and furr: "The actresses have kept Jahrzehntelang silent and have only spoken when Siedamit could expect greatest possible resonance – and EineÜberprüfung accuracy of ir information is as good as impossible. You have nothing more to fear from a prosecutor or judge ".
Damuss man Gisela Friedrichen contradicts: Of course, dieVorwürfe are of interest, even if y are no longer persecuted networks. Today we do not know of mass verübtenSexualverbrechen committed by self-appointed reform pedagogues at DerOdenwald School, nor of child abuse of Catholic institutions such as Berliner Canisius-Kolleg or Denunmenschlichen Circumstances in European orphanages, Hättendie victims are contended to those conditions that friedrichen denStandard as a precondition.
Date Of Update: 12 January 2018, 12:03
