Jameda: 10/10, here happy again sick

The medical evaluation Portal Jameda must adapt its business model. But this does not change the problem: The blind faith in the evaluation economy of the Internet.

Jameda: 10/10, here happy again sick
Content
  • Page 1 — 10/10, here happy again sick
  • Page 2 — valuation inflation
  • Read on a page

    The Wi-Fi in waiting room did not work for Netflix in HDgereicht. The soap dispenser in toilet was out. I was able to smell exaggerated perfume of talk-time help even through nasal congestion and doctor did not Kurgeschickt me for pus in face. And that after I had to wait a whole two hours without an appointment. OhneNetflix! Note 5!

    This is not a real evaluation of a practice on Jameda, Deutschlandsgrößtem portal for doctor's recommendations. But she could be. The website allows patients, doctors and physicians to rate grades and comments. From ambience of practice to waiting times to zurtatsächlichen treatment everything is possible. Many people use Jamedamittlerweile in search for new doctors, and it is reasonable to assume that categorize notes influence ir decision.

    Not all doctors, especially those with NegativenBewertungen, find system great. A Cologne dermatologist had sued before EinigenJahren against her entry on Jameda. After being subjected to court twice, Federal Supreme Court (BGH) decided on this Tuesday: portal must delete its data. Allerdingsnicht on basis of evaluations, but because in opinion of judges business model of portal is not neutral. Doctors have been able to pay for a premium membership and were n shown on profiles of non-paying doctors. The platform must not do so in future in accordance with judgment. In a press release, Jameda Bereitsan announced that he had changed ad presentation and wanted to continue to list Alleniedergelassenen doctors in Germany. That was covered by previous court decisions.

    The evaluation company on net

    Although BGH judgement could have EineSignalwirkung for or evaluation portals and ir business models, this does not change Benoteritis widespread in Internet. It fights symptoms, but does not change DerUrsache: that now everything and everyone is evaluated and in worst Falldie people blindly trust notes.

    One could say, freely according to Murphy's Law, that everything that can be evaluated is evaluated. Those who travel on internet are most likely part of evaluation economy. They have been around since Anfängendes world Wide Web. But at latest since success of social networks, VonSharingplattformen and Smartphoneapps, personal recommendation has become zumKapital.

    Marketplaces like ebay ("10/10, Happy again!") and Amazon ("Prima knife with nuclear power plant") are consolidating mutual Bewertungals of trust between buyer and seller. On platforms WieYelp, TripAdvisor and Google we rate hotels, restaurants undDienstleister. Twitter and Facebook introduced like; The blue thumb is inzwischendas quasi international sign for: "I like it!" Today vergebenwir asterisks to taxi drivers, suppliers, our AIRBNB hosts and dieneuste Netflix series. We like and swipe strange people in Datingapp, praise comments on time online and sweet dog pictures on Instagram. Andmounted The airport toilet ask friendly robot faces to tell Dochbitte how clean it was.

    Evaluations and recommendations Könnenhilfreich be able to give an orientation. An ebay seller who, according to customers, only delivers every third order, is probably wirklichnicht trustworthy. If 30 out of 50 customers of a pizzeria complain about months Hinwegdie broken Flushing, n owners seem to have anderePrioritäten as welfare of ir guests. The more reviews There are, clear will make statements.

    The many problems with ratings

    Theoretically, that's true. In practice, however, things are more difficult. Because a rating on internet is not to be compared with recommendation of a good friend, which is not only due to fact that ratings are liked to be forged or purchased. The larger dieBewertungsökonomie on internet, Nichtsaussagender are dieErgebnisse. Especially when it comes to more complex matters than a Kaufauf ebay or ordering a dinner.

    Evaluations are rarely objective, but often reflect state of mind of evaluators. On platforms such as Yelp or Jameda, it is n above all eir flushness or very bad experiences that lead to evaluations. Bad memories remain in our memory for a longer time and disappointed customers tend to prefer to leave negative feedback. So anyone who sits mitBrechdurchfall in a crowded waiting room and is n einergestressten to help with Office hours, evaluates Erfahrungmöglicherweise rar than someone who quickly reached with time to take blood. The majority of patients who found Arztbesuchund treatment simply okay, may not dazuäußern. Individual negative – or positive – evaluations refore do not say much about quality of a practice.

    Date Of Update: 21 February 2018, 12:04
    NEXT NEWS