”Maybe the EUROPEAN union can be improved, but in a troubled time, if we manage to do well, even better, together?” From a public relations point of view, this argument is proved good. From the perspective of a sanningsperspektiv it's kind of miserable. In view of the EU's expansion, far in excess of a clear democratic mandate, it is nonsense on stilts to claim that the EU to increase cohesion and stability on the european continent. Not since the pre-democracy, the impact of the conflict between the people and the förvaltningselit have been so pronounced. The EUROPEAN union is playing a key role in this process.
How so? Well, the Nordic countries used to be gräsrotsförankringens ancient area. A leader with one foot in the practical, in reality, the soil would not be the slightest difficulty in that awful voice of the popular sentiments of the time. The relationship between the leaders and the people, characterized by mutual understanding and respect.
we truly Believe in the value of genuine collaboration – co-operation based on mutual respect between the leader and the electorate, we should immediately cut the UNION link.
Today, at the time? Instead of looking down, look, too many of the political leaders of the up. To the EUROPEAN union-the top of the pyramid, where the non-elected EUROPEAN commission, and will remain, the EUROPEAN powers in the epicenter. Listen to the commissioner, at any time, and the description of the problem is so hopeless simplistisk that it can only be in one modellvärld: There are no real problems with the federalisttanken Or with the euro Or with the enhanced defence cooperation. It has, indeed, begun to say, the people do not understand their own best interest, and the referendum, therefore, is questionable.
the Problems are when power is concentrated in the
basically, development is not surprising. Just as there will be times when huge amounts of power concentrated in one place.
In its initial limited form, adding the system is a good value.
the Budget tillsättningsmakten is used to incorporate the majority of the samhällsauktoriteter in their own advocacy networks.
< A gloriös internberättelse is developed, which is characterized by an ends justify the means attitude.
It is the cumulative result of many small steps that lead to overexpansion.
the Debate is getting increasingly monotone, and PR-driven. At the end portrayed the critics as a subversive radical.
the Lesson to be learned? The EUROPEAN culture of the day, scrambled to respond to the growing number of constituents who are concerned about the constant maktackumuleringen and related demokratierosionen - which is something that the cat dragged in. Through the leaders, who would not have had the shadow of a chance of advancing to the leaders with the exception of the first line and sinker, swallowed the EUROPEAN union's ”information package”.
this Setting is for people to not understand it
Hence, the EUROPEAN leaders of the day, which is sometimes reminiscent of the policy and programmed of the students who speak with an authority be in place in order to give the appearance of a wisdom that does not exist. As to the degree of good faith is, including the right patriarkföreställningen that the people do not know their own best interest, is a part of the problem. In practice, this means that the miserable state to the EUROPEAN union-the unit ensures a constant conflict between the politikerkast and options.
At this point, it has been extremely irresponsible, and perhaps even childish, to argue that the EUROPEAN construction is still conducive to maintaining peace and cohesion in Europe. We truly believe in the value of genuine collaboration – co-operation based on mutual respect between the leader and the electorate, we should immediately cut the UNION link.
Therefore, the nordic co-operation as a success
The nordic co-operation is perhaps the world's most successful multinational co-operation. Why is that? Cooperation is based on the intimate, but to weaken our democracy. For each country, preserving the ability to say "no thanks" to the rest of the partner countries ' proposals, and yet here we are more integrated with the Nordic countries than in the EU. We have a social union, a common labour market, and we are able to coordinate many of the international points of view. For example, the environment and development policy within the UN framework. All of this without a costly and maktfullkomlig administrative body.
It is precisely our own, the nordic model of cooperation – not in Brussels – of which we should be building the future of international co-operation. Preferably, in close co-operation with the European at this time, believe it or not, the democratic standard bearer the british electorate. < / span> < / span>
Omvärldsstrateg, and the author of a book on ”Sweden's role in the new Europe: the 17 reasons for the Svexit, and the international system reboot.”
the President of the people's movement No to the EUROPEAN union.
a Spokesperson for the Folkebevægelsen the courage of the EUROPEAN union, Danmark < / span>
the Former chairman of the national movement for the Alternative to the EUROPEAN union, Finland, < / span>
the Chairman of the Heimssyn, the republic of Iceland.
as a member of the Board of Nei til EU, Norway
READ MORE: is for our taxpayers to support the unemployed, the greeks and the Portuguese?
READ MORE: , Sweden, to become a vassal state – the pro-europeans sound like hovnarrar Everything you need to know about the Brexit – inUpdated Date: 01 November 2019, 01:00