In an op-ed in the Express newspaper on 16 October, I presented historical data showing that the number of deaths from weather-related natural disasters over the past 120 years have shown a welcome fall. In response, on november 4, using seven of the scholars to its academic importance, and to misstänkliggöra of my subjects, and for the spread of the speculative claims.

The seven, the scientists say, that my motive is to present the statistics above is to ”drive public opinion against the klimatmarscherna”. Here, the guess is they will be. As a scientist, should you don't have to guess. It occurs almost always in the wrong, as is the case here as well. My reason for referring to these statistics was to make the debate more informed. Knowledge is the key to making the right choice for the future.

as Of the good grounds for the accused, Donald Trump, and his ilk, in order to reject the available knowledge about the problem of climate change. We are taking the climate challenge seriously, must not fall into the trap. This is also the case when the knowledge conflicts with our established understanding of the case.
* Including deaths due to droughts, storms, hurricanes, forest fires, extreme cold and heat, as well as the usa.Source: Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED)for each of the events is mixed up
As I said in my contribution to the debate, there is no doubt that many people today are suffering and dying due to weather-related events, even if it is less, than in the past. I support this with statistical data (see chart above), since it is the trends over a period of time, which can tell you how climate change is affecting the community. In this context, one should not draw conclusions based on what was happening.

the climate challenge is too important for us to be afraid in order to challenge the incumbent, however, to be unfounded truths.

seven researchers are selecting, as well as to run the individual events. I don't want to exclude the possibility that climate change played a role, but, surprisingly enough, refers to ”in Central america, there are tens of thousands of young sugar cane plantation had kidney failure”. Fact of the matter is that those kidney failure is probably the first and the foremost, is due to the sockerrörsfälten is burned before harvesting, so that the plantagearbetarna inhaling large quantities of toxic ash in this work, in combination with the extremely demanding working conditions. A large portion of american sugar cane production is used, by the way, to the words of the seven scientists call the ”fossil-free fuels”.

the Deaths in Qatar, the
It amazes me that each of the seven combined effects that the ”hundreds of construction workers from Nepal have died of heart attacks during the hottest half of the year,” in doha, Qatar. The responsibility for these deaths lies on the authorities of Qatar, a regime which, apparently, cares very little about the gästarbetarnas the welfare and working conditions of workers. There is no reason not to assist the authorities in Qatar to explain away the deaths of the high heat in the country, even though that would have exacerbated the situation.

Greta Thunberg, in his speech at the united nations summit on climate change in september that, ”people are dying”, I was curious to see what the statistics say about the number of people killed in weather-related natural disasters. The numbers I found that it gave me the vital information I wanted to share it with other people. I will have to buy the Swedish researchers put it, as ”a ' classic misuse of statistics.”

the challenge of climate change is too important for us to be afraid in order to challenge the incumbent, however, to be unfounded truths. < / span> < / span>

the Researchers

the central bureau of Statistics of Norway.

READ MORE: , People are dying, " said She, but what's the data?

READ MORE: Klimatkrisens effect is a fact, not åsikterGreta Thunberg, to sail across the ocean, the youtubers