Sigmar Gabriel: He's lost

Sigmar Gabriel has a lot of low-rolled, now he himself was dispowered. Maybe he has to go too, because he never dared to take the big step.

Sigmar Gabriel: He's lost
Content
  • Page 1 — he lost
  • page 2 — somewhere between old macho and new man Sigmar Gabriel has lost as a politician
  • Read on a page

    Yes, this man is plague. Yes, he rolls people down. Yes, he's changed. But all this doesn't make him. Sigmar Gabriel, on or hand, is just a gifted politician. He can convince, conquer and charm people imEinzelgespräch. Often carbonated works in whole halls. He convinces Demokratenund autocrats, small people and sometimes big criminals.

    He has a non-unerring but dochanimalischen political instinct, as it rarely exists. If Gabrielirgendwo sees a gap in political landscape, he pushes into it with power, more precisely: it pushes him into it. If he believes he can see a mistake with a anderensozialdemokratischen politician or a missed chance, he is one who kicks ball into goal, sometimes including opponent. UndMitspieler.

    For him, power is a plastic mass, he kneads it, forms it, it has decidedly something sensual. But now he was dispowered, presumably forever. Probably he really no longer hineingepasstin this new SPD, which AndreaNahles and Olaf Scholz put up re, and yet it will be absent, because re are not many who we even nearly as enormous political powers.

    And so his departure has something tragic and one wonders: Did this really have to be? Could he have done anything else, at least let thing be with Marie and man with hair on his face? This question is too short. The riddle of his loss of power is explained Nuraus his two-time renunciation of power. Why did he once peer Steinbrück Undeinmal Martin Schulz to leave entrance to Chancellor candidacy Empireand in fact brought about his own political end?

    Right policy means simply Loszuspringen

    In all years I have accompanied Sigmar Gabriel Undbeobachtet, I could intellectually never wirklichauflösen a contradiction: The man who can persuade ors so well, sometimes dieselbenMenschen within days of completely opposing viewpoints – DieserMann was never quite convinced of himself. Hours and Aberstunden HatGabriel explained to me why he could not become a candidate in 2014 and Auchnicht in 2017. But more about plausible justifications he found, less let convinced. Politics, no one knows that better than him, is not only to check for hours of water depth and water temperature before manvom jumps ten meters of board. Right politics means, sometimes simply loszuspringen – that water will be in basin, precisely because Manspringt.

    Gabriel did not let or, for example, take step, because she thought it was better – certainly not. But because he believed too little in yourself. There was always a last residual self-mistrust that kept him shall step all way forward.

    Wher he was right with this self-mistrust, Sichnun no longer lets him find out that such a thing only comes to light when one goes last step and actually puts himself in brightest light of Republic. It is certain that Gabriel did not completely control his unusual political Kräftezuweilen – unlike Angela Merkel. Dochwer did that?

    Perhaps it is because of his ambivalence as a man. Gabriel is much more sensitive than a Gerhard Schroeder, who lived his Machismo with volume and thigh clapping, with sentimentality instead of sensibility, he was type who hardly ever admits mistakes, overplays m, überschreitunds over m. Sigmar Gabriel has something of all this, but he is not really, to right macho it has (fortunately) hardly ever passed.

    Date Of Update: 09 March 2018, 12:02
    NEXT NEWS