A Kopftuchverbotfür children under age of 14 is correct. Because parents or communities who already want to see ir children with eight or twelve Jahrenverhüllt sexualize eir child or train ir daughters at an early age to wear headscarf. Jeälter, independent, critical and rebellious y become – especially in such a free society as Germans – more difficult it would be for parents to persuade or even force child to wear headscarf.
A ban would reach precisely those families who ihrerTöchter disregard right to self-determination. It would certainly not stop all se parents from forcing ir child from 14 to headscarf – but eshilft those who find this tradition mselves moronic, sichaber pressure of community. And it helps children, find at least in most important years of development do not have to feel "different", who can feel freedom also in ir hair. The ban would give m feeling that y belong not only to ir or grandparents of ir community, but also to part DerMehrheitsgesellschaft.
"It is forbidden in Germany" would be a legitimate statement. Not because Daskleine child is threatening society with headscarf or wants to islamize Germany, but because child's freedom and DasWohl in a liberal secular society are about derReligionsfreiheit of parents. At same time, Verbotsymbolisch and in fact role of headscarf in DieserGesellschaft would define: wearing headscarf may only be accepted and respected DerFrau Alsindividuelle decision within framework of right of self-determination – without headscarf Zuverharmlosen or to Idealize.
After all, Diekopftuchlosen head towel defenders forgot to deny undverdrängen to like that cloth may be from point of view derMehrheitsgesellschaft an individual expression of ReligiösenIdentität, for communities but exactly Rollespielt, Enlightened headscarf critics see: a Instrumentsozialer control.
Coercion, education, voluntary decision?There is vieleGründe why women wear a headscarf. Coercion, education, voluntary decision as an expression of religious identity. Or as a way out for young women to be allowed to participate in GesellschaftlichenLeben. The headscarf applies to her family undCommunity n as a promise to behave according to IslamischenSitten. There are also women who undergo self-dersozialen control; It is a promise to yourself not to celebrate mehrzu with alcohol and men through club nights, but to devote mselves entirely to faith. Because AlleKopftuchträgerinnen know: you are under special observation by your community.
Of course, Könnensich women voluntarily opt for a headscarf, just as sichMenschen decide to smoke or get a Facebook account – knowing price y Entscheidungbezahlen for this. is smoking less harmful to health? GehtFacebook by voluntariness more transparent with data? DieEntscheidung for headscarf is a decision against VieleFreiheiten. The wearer not only refuses to be sexually available, but also to be sexually free. The headscarf is eineUniform, which is associated with strict etiquette. The Make-up, dieArt and manner in which she wears her headscarf, her clos, when consult meets a man in public, maintains ODERIHM proximity shows – all this no longer belongs to her individuellenund personal area of life, but may be Communitybeurteilt and convicted.
The fact that young women wear Nike sneakers with ir passionately curved eyeliner to headscarf, as Ulf Poschardt cites, is a phenomenon that is misconstrued. Modern women do not want to carry tradition with m. But it mainly women from traditional families who lebenmöchten modern. Why do we see ir religiosity, but not IhrenFreiheitsdrang? Their individual freedom often ends with ModernenKleidung. Perhaps women would claim y are wearing dasTuch for sake of emancipation. Your parents would certainly say DasGegenteil.
Date Of Update: 18 April 2018, 12:02
